How do you handle conflict at work?

Most team conflict happens in the wrong place: in DMs after the meeting instead of in the room. This free 4-minute quiz shows your default conflict style and when it helps or hurts your team.

Question 1 of 15 0%
Direction

A teammate's proposal has a flaw you are sure about. You're more likely to:

Peer Friction

Two teammates are arguing in a thread you're tagged in. You're more likely to:

Deadlines

Your manager sets a deadline you think is unrealistic. You're more likely to:

Hidden Risk

The plan everyone likes has a risk nobody has mentioned. You're more likely to:

Resources

You and a peer both want the same engineer for your projects. You're more likely to:

Handoffs

A partner team keeps missing handoffs that affect your work. You're more likely to:

Repair

A teammate is upset about how you handled a shared task. You're more likely to:

Scope

You're negotiating scope with a stakeholder. You're more likely to:

Credit

Someone presents an idea you raised earlier as their own. You're more likely to:

Tools

The team can't agree on which of two tools to adopt. You're more likely to:

Strong Views

You have strong views on a direction the team is debating. You're more likely to:

Recurring Fights

A retro surfaces the same fight between two functions for the third time. You're more likely to:

Tense Follow-Up

You have a 1:1 with your manager the day after a tense meeting. You're more likely to:

Working Styles

A teammate's working style grates on you. You're more likely to:

Review

Your idea is getting picked apart in a review. You're more likely to:

Your conflict range

Where your default style helps, and the two styles you reach for least.

Unlock your personalized read

Your result is above. Drop your email to reveal the rest of your read, right here on this page.

Shown instantly on this page. No inbox required.

What to watch for next

Your style under pressure is the one that counts.

QuestWorks is a 25-minute weekly game where disagreement has to happen on the clock, at fictional stakes. Because the team is playing, it handles conflict the way it really works, and you get a weekly Team Intelligence score built from that behavior.

Try it free

The Five Conflict Styles

The five-style model of conflict comes from organizational research that goes back to Robert Blake and Jane Mouton's managerial grid (1964). Kenneth Thomas and Ralph Kilmann refined it in the 1970s into two dimensions: assertiveness, how hard you push for your own position, and cooperativeness, how much you work to meet the other person's needs. Where you sit on those two dimensions gives five styles.

Competing

High assertiveness, lower cooperation. Take a position and hold it.

Collaborating

High on both. Work the problem until both sides' needs are met.

Compromising

Middle on both. Trade to find a solution everyone can accept.

Avoiding

Low on both, in the moment. Step back and let it cool or resolve.

Accommodating

Lower assertiveness, high cooperation. Give ground so the team can move.

Each of the 15 questions pairs two styles in a realistic work situation, and each style appears in six questions. Your default style is the one you chose most. This is an independent quiz with original questions. It is not the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI), which is published by The Myers-Briggs Company.

Why Conflict Style Is a Team Problem

No conflict style is the best one. Each one fits some situations and backfires in others. The problem on most teams is that everyone uses their default everywhere, and the defaults interact badly: Peacekeepers and Supporters go quiet, Challengers fill the space, and the disagreement moves to DMs.

The cost is measurable. CPP Inc.'s workplace conflict study found US employees spend about 2.8 hours a week dealing with conflict, and The Myers-Briggs Company's 2022 follow-up found managers spend more than 4. Not all of that time is waste. A 2012 meta-analysis of 116 studies by de Wit, Greer, and Jehn found that disagreement about the work itself is not reliably harmful and can help performance when it stays separate from personal friction.

That separation is a team habit, and it predicts how a team performs under pressure. When peers can argue about the work in the room and still commit to the call, decisions get made in one meeting. When they cannot, every unresolved disagreement lands on the manager, who becomes the referee for all of them.

A quiz tells you your default. QuestWorks shows how the team actually handles it. Each week a 25-minute quest puts the team under actual time pressure with fictional stakes. Because people are playing, they disagree, take point, and concede the way they really do, and that behavior feeds a weekly Team Intelligence score. The next quest adapts to what the team needs to practice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does this quiz take?

+

About 4 minutes. There are 15 questions, and each one asks you to choose between two realistic responses to a work situation. Your result appears as soon as you answer the last one, and no email is needed to see it.

Which conflict style is best?

+

None of them. Competing fits a crisis, collaborating fits a high-stakes decision with time to work it through, compromising fits a stuck trade-off, avoiding fits a fight that will be forgotten next week, and accommodating fits an issue that is more important to the other person. Strong teams use the whole range.

Is this the Thomas-Kilmann (TKI) assessment?

+

No. This is a free quiz with original questions based on the same five-style model. The official Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument is published by The Myers-Briggs Company, and QuestWorks is not affiliated with it.

Can my conflict style change?

+

Your default tends to be stable, but people shift under pressure. Many people who collaborate on a normal day move toward avoiding or competing when they are stressed or short on time. Retaking the quiz after a hard quarter often shows a different result.

How should a team use these results?

+

Have everyone take it and share their default style. The useful conversation is about where the defaults collide: who tends to go quiet, who tends to fill the space, and which decisions keep ending up with the manager.

Is my data private?

+

Your answers are scored on your device, then submitted without your name so we can improve the assessment. We only collect your email if you choose to enter it to unlock the rest of your result, and we never share it.

Teams that quest
just work.

Performance under pressure, predicted and perfected. A 25-minute weekly game your team will want to play, and a weekly Team Intelligence score built from how they actually work together. 30-day free trial, four game days, no credit card.

Try it free